Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7
Gulutzan never struck me as a very good coach, but was willing to give the benefit of the doubt, maybe Treliving saw something in him that I didn't? But man, I don't think he got a single thing right last night. Next game better not be more of the same, he is instilling zero confidence in me as a coach.
|
Just have to ask yourself a few questions about Treliving to calm these worries down.
We know the man is a methodical tireless worker ... so he didn't hire a bad coach because he was too lazy to interview other people.
We know the man is process driven ... which means this wasn't a scan hockeydb and make a decision. We can probably assume (actually we've heard) that there was a pretty in depth process with systems and what ifs that helped them arrive at what they want behind the bench.
Burke doesn't know him, so that panic cycle can be skipped this time around. And even if he did we've seen enough hints lately that Treliving is going his way and not Burke's now.
So then what are we left with?
1. The process failed and they hired a dud
2. Treliving himself is a dud as he got the right guy with the wrong system.
3. It's one game