Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Think one big thing that really stands out in that chart is just how buried with tough starts the Brodie - Engelland pairing was.
Corsi For and against looks bad but they were getting completely buried with d-zone starts. Would be interesting to see how that pairing performs with a more balanced utlization.
|
Maybe. Let's explore. Adjusting for zone starts by removing the first ten seconds after faceoffs, we get
Engelland-Brodie
321:47 TOI
1.49 GF
1.68 GA
47.1 GF%
43.07 CF60
69.18 CA60
38.4 CF%
That methodology isn't especially favorable to them for Corsi but does help their goals against pretty notably.
We can also look at adjusting for score, venue, and zone starts with Corsica.Hockey's
more complicated methodology, we get
Engelland-Brodie
536.66 TOI (* I think this includes the 2015 playoffs though. I couldn't filter out regular season only to be consistent with all of Puckalytics' stats.)
Shot Attempts
46.38 CF60
65.51 CA60
41.45 CF%
-6.09 Rel.CF%
Expected Goals (factors in shot type / shot distance / shot angle)
1.9 xGF60
2.55 xGA60
42.7 xGF%
-5.44 Rel.xGF%
Goals
1.57 GF60
2.13 GA60
42.46 GF%
-12.95 Rel.GF%