Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
So, the city including the costs is disingenuous, but the Flames ignoring them because they would have been done anyway is cool?
The point is that the flames want it done on their timeline, to their incredible benefit, and it's an actual part of the cost. So no, it's not disingenuous.
That's what it costs, whether it's on the Flames timetable or years further out when the EV is done building out.
|
Heck no. If you've been following me in this thread you'd know that I'm very pro-city here and have lambasted the Flames at lengths about how disingenuous and intellectually insulting their opening offer was ($980M which just covered inside battery limits scope).