Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Policing? Over hockey opinions?
That type of thing will basically demotivate people from posting viewpoints that differ from the majority.
I don't think we need to keep score over who is right and wrong
I think opinions should be debated and well defended. But if someone had a rationale argument that ended up being wrong what's the issue?
|
What type of message board with this be if posters weren't in some way accountable for the posts that they make?
How am I supposed to take someone seriously if they continually make wrong predictions and assertions without reflecting on their previous statements for accuracy?
The worst types of posters will be the worst offenders for this, if posters aren't going to reflect and absorb where they have been correct and incorrect, how is anyone going to improve as a poster?
Are we content as a community to have someone's loud-mouthed ignorance be equal to that of reserved and informed opinion? Is this calgaryflames.com or hfboards or is it a community with a higher standard?
Should I just take "where r u chris o'sullivan's" posts as being equal to Pierre Monster McGuire or Freeway or getbak?
In my opinion, why bother even having posts saved on the server if they aren't going to be reflected upon and used for historical context, why not just have every thread that falls off the main page automatically deleted?
This place would be a much better community if posters were more accountable to the posts they make. It's an effective way to populate your ignore list when you see the same ill-informed hysterics from the same ill-informed posters time after time.