Quote:
Originally posted by albertGQ+Nov 3 2004, 01:00 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (albertGQ @ Nov 3 2004, 01:00 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm@Nov 2 2004, 11:56 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Pagal4321
|
Quote:
@Nov 3 2004, 12:54 AM
What mini-mod? I get that you are trying to understand why they would be against it but to continually harp him until he gives you a suitable answer....Yea that's the way to go. They aren't hurting anyone with their opinions are they?
|
They are probably doing more hurt in society with those close minds then two men doing it to each other are.
|
Okay MMF, I will ask you this. A man has been told by many doctors that he can never have kids. His sister has been told by even more doctors she can never have kids. They decide to get married. They are siblings. Everytime they have sex in the comfort of their own home, he uses a condom. There will be no pregancy so no deformed kids.
Would you or would you not be against this incest marriage? They are two individuals that are deeply in love and have been for decades. Their lifestyle does not affect you whatsoever. You are telling me you would vote yes to their marriage?
I wouldn't [/b][/quote]
I wouldn't care. I probably would abstain from voting.
In this actual instance no harm could come from it. But unfortunately, we can't vote on 'instances' only on an overriding law. So as more harm could come from incestual marriages I would vote no. Gay marriages, not the same level of biological harm. So yes.
You can't vote on actual instances so all these what if are a watse of time and dilute the debate.