Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
See this is part of the problem here. Photon did his best to try and explain how incidental compartmentalization happens within an organization because of job responsibility. It was extremely valid but you chose to ignore it. It plays greatly in this investigation, because the FBI were attempting to discover if someone at a high level was aware of, or was responsible for, the destruction of data. The FBI granted immunity because they needed to cooberate what they believed to be true, but could not get anyone to talk because of possible self incrimination. The immunity was granted to go after the bigger fish by discovering who said what and when. Unfortunately the FBI found that the ones responsible for the illegal actions were the ones they granted immunity to.
As to the public official's responsibility to record keeping, this has been explained again and again and again. The assumption was that the record was intact because of the originating source of emails. When the State Department discovered the potential for records not being maintained, they ordered Clinton to sync data from here server to the State Dept servers, which they did. She ordered her people to comply, and believed they did. Evidence supports this took place. She then ordered her people to delete records, long before the subpoena, and believed her people complied. Unfortunately her contractors screwed the pooch and did not comply. When the subpoena came in they had an "oh ####" moment and realized they had not followed through on the deletion request. Rather than fall on their sword for not complying with that request, and risk getting fired, they made a bad decision to delete the records after the fact, and after the record hold was in place by subpoena. The responsible party is the admin of the system, not the person three to five positions removed. That is what the FBI found and why there were not charges in this case.
Bottom line, it's done. It's over and there is nothing left but for a bull#### sub-committee to manufacture outrage and create dirt to throw at a candidate during a presidential campaign.
|
Good summary. I don't know why it is so hard for some people to believe that sometimes the boring and easiest answer is the right one. It just has to be a conspiracy where the FBI is trying to control the election results. We want scandal dammit! If anything, the FBI took measures to try and catch Clinton and it backfired by then having no one to prosecute.
It's amazing that after 2 years of this, this is the best that the Trump side can muster and nothing he does or says sticks.