Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer
I'll plead guilty to this. I don't hold them to the same standard.
Trump is a clown; his propaganda is transparent.
Clinton assumes the mantle of the most powerful and qualified Presidential candidate in history; her propaganda is specious, refined, and thorough.
That's why these tactics of dissemble, obfuscate, and discredit are more effective. And because they are more effective, I object to them more strenuously.
|
I hope you can't vote as you are obviously utterly unable to make a rational decision, what you are saying is you'd rather buy a piece of crap Russian made car because you don't hold them to as high a build standard as Japanese cars therefore the non working cigarette lighter on the Honda is way worse than the the engine blowing up randomly on the Lada.
This is a straight choice based on only one criteria, who will be the best president, that's it, full stop.
If you make this choice on anything else, including party, politics, even relative honesty and certainly whether you 'like' them then you are moron that shouldn't be allowed to vote. I am a socialist but I have voted Tory, Liberal, NDP and Labour ( back in the UK) over my forty odd years of voting based on either how crappy my own parties candidate is or how good the other guys are.
The decision on who runs a country is too damned important to be approached the way you support a hockey team and the fact that in the US in particular the voters seem to think this way is why the US is looking increasingly screwed .