Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer
The recent developments on the email front include;
-senior members of Sect. Clinton's staff received immunity in exchange for analyzing their laptops
-these immune staffers being present, as advisors and lawyers, during the FBI interview with Sect. Clinton
-false exculpatory statements & successful attempts to cover-up of the crime were not sufficient to prove intent, which was already a tenuous standing (since the statute does not require intent)
But keep crying about how the real crime is me polluting the thread.
|
What law are you discussing? Every law I've seen specifically requires intent. That's why they didn't proceed