Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
I think if he was committing fraud, you would have heard about it by now, or it would have gotten out somehow. Plus, you'd have to be committing some magic fraud to reduce your tax liability via fraud on $600+ million income to nil.
Its all likely shelters, estates, and trusts that get him out of the taxes (for now), but again, looks bad to Joe Q. Public, but good on him.
Its the same thing with offshore companies. Public acts like its committing murder, smart people think its smart. Legal tax avoidance is something everyone should be thinking about.
You would probably not learn all that much from the tax returns (honestly, you'll learn a lot more from all the financial disclosures he's already made). Hillary implied in the debate the taxes would show he might not be wealthy (again, not what tax returns are for).
His son actually gave a very candid answer to this. Releasing the tax returns would provide very little new good information, and would just become a distraction because there is a lot in there that can be taken the wrong way and made to look bad (like Hillary already has).
I'm sure he has some skeletons in his closet and tax returns, but that is half of his appeal.
|
Well, you are certainly taking him at his word. The Politifact fact-checkers would disagree with that assessment.
For me the main issue with the tax returns, concern his use of charitable donations (or lack thereof). Tax returns don't necessarily prove he is wealthy or not, but it would certainly provide more clarity on his income, as distinct from his companies' or his charitable foundation.