Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
The whole 'stop and frisk' portion for Trump was a disaster. I get it appeals to his racist voters but he was so bad there. Arguing about it with Holt, claiming that it was a judges fault, would have won on appeal. He did say something about taking away guns too, didnt he? So he is pro guncontrol in an unconstitutional way...hmmm.
|
The stop and frisk portion of the debate was cringe inducing. It's absolutely unconstitutional and a affront to people's dignity. This isn't East Berlin. Regardless of the net positive outcome, the ends do not justify the means when it comes to stop and frisk.
From what I gathered from the gun control portion, Trump exclaimed his support for banning firearm sales to those on a no fly list, and helping people get off said list if they have been wrongly placed on it. The rest of his gun grabbing pertained to stop and frisk, getting firearms out of the hands of criminals, yada yada. Clintons proposal during the debate on controls cuts a larger swath on prohibitions outside of just a no fly list and gang activity.