Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
The difference is one makes a known crook a crook. His foundation has about a million dollars in it. On the other side, you have a former president and a current presidential nominee who's $300 million dollar foundation is taking in donations from the Saudis that are 25 times the size of Trump's entire foundation's assets.
Do you honestly think that those two stories are on the same scale? Honestly?
And yes, that crook is running for president, but no one who supports him seems to care that he's a crook. Trump U didn't do anything, his past real estate deals didn't do anything, why would this?
|
But what is the "story" exactly is my point. The potential quid pro quo, but nothing proven and no evidence offered to suggest it will happen. So if the quid pro quo turns out to be true, then yes it's a bigger story. But as of now, my point is there isn't actually a story here. Just a theory. The Trump stuff is, well, an actual story. That doesn't mean it should be covered wall to wall non-stop, but it deserves to be covered more than the Clinton Foundation until there's evidence and not just "Saudi Arabia donated, so.....". Again what could she even do to help the Saudi's that the Americans aren't already doing? Sell even more arms? Ignore even more funding of terror? It's not like she can do much more for them.