saw this debate awhile ago, never brought it up because of the framed debate, the ridiculousness of amy goodman in her steadfast belief in the government's 9/11 story.
amy goodman, noam chomsky, ward churchill, they NEED this muslim attack as much as the neo-cons. it embodies their blowback thesis and every book they've written.
pentagon - cell phones - yawn. nothing concrete at all, they are endless debates.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?doc...2F11+mysteries
9/11 mysteries, interesting new film, focuses on the evidence of demolition and little else.
if amy goodman really wanted an honest debate she would invite the scholars for 9/11 truth or other heavyweights of the hardcore info like alex jones or jim marrs (who wrote the book 'JFK' was based on').
not to slam the makers of loose change, who are nice guys that have done a lot to raise the issue, but they're young / inexperienced in filmmaking and the film just doesn't go far enough. it meanders on their pet theories and presents some evidence that i consider perimeter or even false.
it does have a slick soundtrack and an interesting interview with hunter s. thompson though.
governments have always done this kind of thing, 'terrorstorm' in my signature gives a good rundown of some specific 20th century examples.