Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
The deletion that took place, after the order, was the action of Combetta. It was his decision and action to delete the files on the server along with the backups. It was also his decision to try and cover his tracks using Bleach Bit. The fact that there was a meeting three weeks later is indicative of legal counsel preparing to act on the preservation order and present information as outlined. The Timeframe presented by the Examiner reporter, supposedly from FBI docs, is what informed the decision to not lay charges. They could clearly see who did what when, and it was an IT guy trying to save his own butt. That clearly answers the question of the deletion, and Platt River was responsible of any wrong doing in that regard.
|
PRN, who you suggested were Clinton allies, appear to have stayed on the Clinton payroll* and stonewalled the investigation.
The IT guy appears to have accepted all the blame.
It could be the truth...it could be that the guy with immunity was the fall-guy. Hardly an exotic concept or fanciful notion.
The court of public opinion does not need to meet the standards of criminal court.
*that is disputable - see Connect Colorado link earlier in thread. Attempting to recover costs is proof of nothing, but it does suggest an arrangement