Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Your examples are all good, and if we were basing it on 5 games I'd be with you.
My numbers were 3 seasons for Wideman and Russel. So to discount it you'd have to have all your examples only hurting them and never helping them which seems pretty unlikely.
Big sample sizes of collected data will correct for those things.
|
correct or maybe make look worse.
but in year one of 3 they were on an awful team and would have had just awful forwards on theice with them.... Stajan being the #1C ... Stempniak putting up a -21 ... Monahan a -20.
If you look at numbers for 3 years that is like saying Monahan is a 50 pt forward.