Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Yeah, those few months are worthwhile blowing every bit of political capital a president has accrued for such a short period of time. This is exactly why this scenario plays out all the time.
Again, more extremism to try and make a point. Look at the most unique time in American history and equate that to SOP. Stupid with scattered pockets of stupidness.
Except that if your highly uneducated perspective on the court were accurate it would happen all the time. Fortunately there are checks and balances in the system that make manipulations like this pretty difficult. Take an American civics class and learn how the system works before bringing this stuff. We Americans would appreciate if you truly understand the process before trying to tell us how it works to anyone's advantage.
What are the numbers for Powerball, since you are so certain of outcomes. Just so you are aware, the Senate could change regardless of a Clinton presidency, and that Senate Judiciary Committee would have the responsibility of acting as the check and balance to a Trump presidency. That is the way the system is design and the way it works. |
The original statement was that Clinton can't change the second amendment. Which while true the point is that she could spend political Capital to do so.
It isn't an unreasonable statement to say than gun ownership will be more restricted under a Clinton presidency then a trump one. And since people don't spilt tickets anymore a vote for Clinton is a vote for a democratic senate whee senate races are being held and is a vote for more restrictive gun rules.