Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
I didn't say that you weren't.
RE: ticket tax. In the sense that it'll (eventually) come out of the demand derived ticket price revenue sure. But it won't contribute one dime to the actual construction of the project. Hence why I said the amount they're willing to front is remarkably tiny. Heck, when you get right down to it the it's not like the owners are really foregoing that exact amount of money on the ticket tax considering that a significant portion of it would go to the players as part of HRR and another couple of chunks would go to provincial and federal tax coffers. It's not exactly a big give when yo get right down to it.
It's the language they use that I dispute not the ultimate downstream source of the funds. They could have just as easily said "The City will contribute X, CS&E will provide Y, and the City will receive revenue streams with an anticipated value of Z over the life of the facility".
|
Yes it would.
The ticket tax is a revenue stream. That revenue stream would allow for a bond to be issued, which would raise the $200M (and be used for construction). The ticket tax would pay off the bond.
Side note: my understanding was that the ticket tax would pay principal
and interest. Where is it stated that the city would be expected to pay the interest on that bond? That makes no sense (and of course the city wouldn't do it). What is more likely to me is that the city would
guarantee it. Big difference.