Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
Sadly its a little more complicated than that when the Crown cannot prove it lawfully took up your lands (the case in BC where there is no treaties)
|
See and to get real nitpicky here I still disagree. A supreme court ruling should be able to apply reasonableness here, even in the event of no treaty in place.
Basically what I'm saying is the NEB declares consultation has been adequate. The FN group sues, saying no. It gets all the way to supreme court. A supreme court decision is levied that states that the constitutional rights for consultation shouldn't trump what's in the best interest of the nation so long as the consultation has been handled relatively adequately and with respect to legitimacy of consultation concerns and most importantly- impacts.