View Single Post
Old 08-24-2016, 03:11 PM   #667
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudreauvertime View Post
Why is it that teams pay more for players who score more? Seems rather arbitrary to not pay the most valuable players as much . . .

Seems like a premium is put on points because its very hard to score in the NHL, and scoring wins you hockey games....
Because points are easily quantifiable and legitimately arbitrary. It is extremey difficult to quantify the value of individual players relative to his team-mates on a team-to-team basis, and the reason for that is because individual contributions to winning are subtle combinations of hundreds of factors in each and every game played.

Agents can readily make the case that X is a larger number than Y, and while a team may believe that Player X's contribution to winning is not as significant as Player Y's, it is difficult to counter because the numbers just simply do not exist to show it.

To put it another way: if the highest scoring players were always the most valuable, then it would stand to reason that the highest scoring team would win the Stanley Cup every year. That does not happen.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post: