Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
And if you clicked mine you'd see why that's still not relevant.
She sent three emails with partial markings that she did not know were classified. Comey himself said she didn't know. If you read the source material or what I posted you'll see how this perjury will not progress and wouldn't even be a point of discussion. I don't think you understand what is required for perjury.
This does not meet the criteria for perjury
Incompetence? Maybe. Perjury? Nope
|
Ok you appear to be trying to argue something that isn't related. The FBI and Comey didn't investigate Perjury charges, they investigated whether or not Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and also if Clinton intentionally passed on Classified information
at the time she sent the emails. That is what they investigated.
The specific accusation of Perjury comes from her testimony to Congress and this specific statement:
Quote:
|
Clinton's comment in question was one she made in testimony to Rep. Jim Jordan, in which she said "there was nothing marked classified on my emails." Comey told the committee that there was indeed classified information that had passed through Clinton's unauthorized email server that she used while as secretary of state.
|
Please note that this testimony came after she was being investigated.