Quote:
Originally posted by FlamesAddiction@Nov 2 2004, 06:30 PM
Could it be that there is simply more dirt on Bush? Kerry hasn't even jumped into the pool yet.
BTW, being a banker to Hitler probably meant a lot less in the 30's than it does now. Before all the horrors of the Nazis came to light, Hitler was actually regarded in a positve light by many in North America because he was anti-communist. In fact, I can't remember his name, but there was a famous conservative at the time who had a radio show (deja-vu) who every week used to praise Hitler and Mussolini. Considering that people didn't know then what they know now, it is a little more forgivable.
|
Its not about presenting an anti-Bush program. More power to them. Be my guest. Go right ahead.
Where's the contrary view? That's the issue.
And what about those saucy introductions? Wouldn't that be the accusation leveled at FOX as well?
By the way, your Globe & Mail today has a review on how the Canadian print media covered the USA election. Fairly it says, in spite of the obvious distate Canadians have for G.W. Bush. Its a subscriber only link.
Cowperson