Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07
the problem with green is that people think it's great until they understand what the impacts are.
If people want to be serious about reducing emissions, there are many problems with each proposed solution.
Coal is dirty as he// but less coal means more fossil fuels ... reserves are hard to find as it is.
reducing use of oil or taxing oil production like Kyoto would have done would mean $2.00 gas. that will make people forget about the benefits of green in a hurry
And wind/solar sounds nice but is unpracticle and expensive.
easy to be an expert and crack on the gov't, conservative or liberal, but the reality is that this is a very complex problem with no easy ... and maybe no complicated solutions.
|
The problem with people like you is you don't understand or have failed to learn about Climate Change. You think green sucks, but don't understand what the impacts are.
The government of Canada has created a program called the RETscreen, it is a wind-power program that analyzes the costs/benefits/profit of wind power anywhere on the planet. You should at least read a bit about it before talking ignorantly about it. There is nothing expensive or unpracticle [sic] (or rather how we say it in english: impractical) about wind power. Wind power doesn't cost... anything and it's not non-renewable.
I don't even think I am going to respond to anything else in your post... You clearly have NO idea what you're talking about and have never bothered to learn anything about renewable or alternative fuel sources, let alone climate change, CO2 emmissions, greehouse gases etc...