Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Remember when you wanted to extend Smid after his short return last season?
|
No, because you're most likely making that up unless I made a tongue-in-cheek comment. I might have said Smid was a better option at different points in time than Russell, Wideman or Engelland and should not have been randomly scratched at a time where he was playing well and they were being liabilities (which was obviously often). How that suddenly equates to wanting to extend a player with a year-and-half left on his deal makes no sense.
You are just flat out lying, as I've noticed you've got some sort of vendetta against me in which you consistently follow my posts around to disparage them. Cute, but pathetic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
You put way too much emphasis on small sample sizes, you're doing it again with Nakladal.
|
How so? By saying he's an adequate (and cheap) fifth/sixth defenseman, with a skillset that adds value compared to a "mediocre depth defenseman"?
Okay there. Apparently, being awful, but reliably awful over a big sample, is more valuable than being good over a small sample.