Quote:
Originally Posted by GaiJin
So Hoffmans new line is that the clause is invalid because the PC's didn't consult the public. Hhmm just like the NDP consulted the public about the carbon tax?
|
The climate panel held open houses and also accepted online submissions for 2 months. If you wanted the most GHG reductions at the lowest cost then congratulations you got it with a carbon tax. If you think that anthropogenic climate change is a hoax, or that are resources are better serve adapting to climate change rather than reducing GHG emissions then you should have told the climate panel that.