Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster
If someone wants to say that Hillary is better referred to as a hawk, rather than a warmonger, I'll listen to that argument.
There are good arguments against having slander and libel and slander rules. Either way, those are civil cases.
There should be no rules against hate speech, unless it specifically calls for specific violence.
Private entities can do what they want in terms of limiting freedom on their platforms (ie Twitter).
Government licensing of broadcasting should not exist (other than perhaps setting initial frequency auctions).
All of the above weaken democracy, they don't strengthen it.
|
You need to make the warmonger case. You haven't yet. You have applied a label which you object to doing and offered no nuance that you demand from others with trump.