Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster
Mr. Khan said in his speech that Trump should not be given the right to carry us into the future, and he cited that Trump had not sacrificed anything.
Either Trump's "sacrifice" is important, or it is not. Unless you are suggesting that Trump's detractors are only applying it to Trump and/or the presidency. Which makes no sense.
The argument here is clear, and Coulter is right: anti-Trumpers are suggesting that sacrifice is an important qualification for public office. It is a nonsense argument by them, and it is a nonsense argument by Khan. It formed the foundation for Khan's entire speech.
|
Buster is such a champion wordsaladsmith, its truly mind boggling. That combined with his assertion about Hillary being a liar, crook and corrupt makes this semantic gymnastic all the more hilarious.