Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
But the perjury argument that Clinton sent emails marked classified and willfully lied about it hasn't changed since the disclosure of the 10k of emails. So why wasn't the perjury investigation started when the evidence first came up? It was known prior to the conclusion of the COmeny investigation that some were marked as classified prior to sending.
This is clearly an attempt to keep the item in the news as long as possible with no real interest in the pursuit of truth.
|
I don't know if it was actually proven prior to the FBI releasing their report whether or not the emails were actually marked as classified or not.
Jason Chaffetz questioning James Comey as he testifies before congress
I find the Q&A on this pretty intriguing, but the answer on what they didn't investigate her for perjury starts at roughly 1:20, but I would encourage you to watch the whole thing.