Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
^It's a weird situation though because the Government was one of the applicants. It's like asking for an order, getting the order, and then appealing the order.
I agree, to the extent that the Board is conducting a hearing and rendering a decision on an application by an interested party. But this is a bit of a different situation, no? My understanding is, they basically just rubber-stamped the agreements. Seems less "quasi-judicial" in its role in this context.
|
These are all great points. I think we'll have to wait for the briefs to see how much of this is correct. I just don't see how a party advancing and supporting something--- especially the government proper --- can then reverse course 16 years later. Rubber-stamp or not it happened.