Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
But so is any judgment made by any arm of government. For example, a decision made by a Minister or his / her delegate is also subject to JR. So that's not a meaningful thing to note. And I'm not clear how the AUC's role in this instance is "quasi-judicial", but happy to be educated on the point.
There's definitely a distinction between an administrative body like the AUC and Courts, in my view at least.
|
Meh, I was just sort of throwing that in there for good measure. Fair enough.
And again, of course there is a distinction between administrative tribunals and the courts. But there are also differences between administrative tribunals and the Minister responsible for the enabling legislation. The key difference is the measure of independence the tribunal has from the Minister (even though it is less independence than the courts enjoy).