Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
You should apply the same semantic rigour to those last two claims that you wanted everyone else to apply to Trump being labelled a racist.
Except that you won't, because your narrative requires two equally bad choices, so that you can continually rail against the one you truly detest under a guise of non-partisanship. You're not a rational observer pointing out the flaws everyone else seems to gloss over, as you perceive yourself to be, you are merely a partisan of some obscure point of view you refuse to do other than vaguely allude to.
So tell us - if you could/can vote in the US election, who would you vote for? My guess is Gary Johnson, which is fine, but maybe try arguing for him as a better candidate than either Clinton or Trump, instead of yelling nonsensically and trying to get an equal hate on against Hillary as everyone else has against Donald. It won't work. She could be Kodos in a human skinsuit and it still would be no contest as to which mainstream candidate is less of an existential threat to civilization.
|
that's an easy test.
State why you would vote for Trump without using the words Hillary or Clinton.
State why you would vote for Hillary without using the words Donald or Trump .
State why you would vote for Johnson without using the words Donald, Trump, Hillary or Clinton.