Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Stonedbirds
SCD, I think an easier argument could be made that while Khan chastised Trump for not making a sacrifice, much to the delight of his democrat handlers, the queen bee herself voted FOR the war in Iraq, where he died, and then voted to pull out (snicker) and essentially hand over the hard fought land and political gains for nothing.
So she essentially sacrificed his son, and then gave away everything that sacrifice and others earned for... Nothing.
Which is worse?
Now before everyone freaks out and Tinordi calls me a bigot, this isn't a position I hold, but rather feel it would be a more effective tactic rather than the one presented by SCD.
|
The weakness of this line of arguement is pulling out of Iraq was overwhelmingly popular in the U.S. even in the GOP base, it's what Obama campaigned on, it's a large part of why he was elected, he and congress and senate had a responsibility to obey the voters wishes at that point.
The reason the GOP's Hawks are wasting their time with this arguement is no one in the U.S. wants to get involved in any of the Middle East's problems, and no one thinks any of this mess is anyone's fault but Bush's.
Essentially the GOP is trying to argue that Hillary and Obama did a lousy job of cleaning up the huge dump that the GOP took on the carpet, there's no way to make that arguement politically that doesn't remind everyone that the GOP took a huge dump on the carpet, while lying about why they were taking a dump to the world in general and the U.S. Voters in particular. It's a stupid arguement politically and a sign that they are not talking to anyone outside of their own whack job supporters, most of whom are nuts.