Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
But that's not my opinion.
That's Wideman's doctor's opinion.
Again, the experts argued that Wideman may have attacked the linesman because of the behavourial affects of concussion. That is not my stance. That is the opinion of the experts hired by the NHLPA.
Why are you dismissing Wideman's experts so readily?
|
You're being daft...re-read your quote. Expert was speaking hypothetically, based on peer-reviewed medical science. He never came anywhere close to saying he thought Wideman attacked Henderson because he was concussed. It was basically that IF you want to believe it was an 'attack', the behaviour could conceivably be explained by a concussion.
But go ahead and keep quoting the only excerpts available to us without full context (via Bettman) as conclusive evidence.