Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
How many of Monahan's 60 pts came from playing with Gaudreau? Before Gaudreau he was a 34 pt guy.
|
Before Gaudreau he was a rookie just drafted...Come on that's being unfair and you know it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
In Monahan's best year he was 3rd in scoring behind Hudler and Gaudreau.
|
His best year was this previous season. 63 points. Behind only Gaudreau.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Totally agree that if Schenn falls back to 40-45 pts like he was for 2 seasons where he was playing on the Briere and then Lecavalier lines where they were well past their primes and he outscored them then he will be over paid.
|
2015-2016 he played with Giroux and Simmonds, put up 59 points.
2014-2015 he played with Giroux and Voracek, put up 47 points
2013-2014 he played with Lecavalier and Simmonds, put up 41 points.
He played more with Giroux and Voracek than Monahan played with Gaudreau in 2014-2015, still only put up 47 points. It's not just while playing with out of their prime players when he was putting up sub 50 points.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
If he stays at 60pt he will be fairly paid.
|
Sure. But your first post said this was a "GREAT" contract.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
If he moves up to 70-80 pts he will be a bargain, value contract.
|
Sure...but you've been arguing that it's not unusual for players to peak offensively at 21...Schenn is 24. Possible he improves, but less chance than say Monahan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
At 40-45 pts he would be overpaid by the 600k he is getting more than Brouwer, who has been signed as a 40-45 pts 200 hit player.
|
Sure, but like you argued in your first post in this thread, you have to account for RFA/UFA years. You broke it down as this:
4, 4, 6 , 6.15
So, according to your own post, as a "UFA" he would be paid 1.5M more than Brouwer.