View Single Post
Old 07-20-2016, 09:17 PM   #7478
wittynickname
wittyusertitle
 
wittynickname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
Cruz talked about freedom and rights, yet he wants to tell women what to do with their own bodies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy City View Post
Radical Islamic terrorism, radical EPA, radical laws, radical radical
The GOP loves "small government" unless you're a gay person trying to get married or adopt a child, or if you're a woman who wants birth control or an abortion.

To the GOP, abortion is murder--but slowly poisoning a community with pollution and toxic waste is the free market at work.

They only like "small government" when it comes to paying for the federal services that they benefit from in the form of taxes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Well if he got the same deal Kasich got, this is your next president if Trump wins.
So I'll stockpile my birth control now, he'll do his best to make sure I can't access it. Because his religious beliefs trump my personal decisions about my body.


Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
Why should the federal government govern things like education. I though education is state jurisdiction?

If voters in Texas want school choice, why does Maine have to abide by it?

Welfare should be cut in favour of things like an enhanced EITC, etc...

And the GOP will not kill Medicare, arithmetic will.
But if Texas wants to whitewash the Trans-Atlantic slave trade out of their textbooks (they do), why should the Federal government allow them to purposefully miseducate the youth that are going to grow up to run this country in the future?

If Texas and other states want to provide non-scientific abstinence only education to their students--despite the fact that it often leads to higher cases of teen pregnancy, higher abortion rates, higher instances of STIs, etc--why should the government allow that to happen, when its the taxpayers who will then be paying for those unplanned babies?

To an extent, yes, states should have some ability to govern at the state level, but there have to be checks and balances, like you aren't allowed to purposefully teach wrong and misleading information to the children in your care.

Also my rights as a woman shouldn't depend on which state lines I live inside. The rights of gay people shouldn't depend on what state they're in. The ability to vote shouldn't depend on the state you live in. Unfortunately, a lot of states take advantage of "states rights" to limit the rights of exactly those people.
wittynickname is offline  
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to wittynickname For This Useful Post: