Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
There are.
Of course, one might argue that Parsons too qualifies most of those as well. Well, other than being super-sized. They're just not a sufficient collection of attributes to make any definitive claims.
Agreed. I am simply arguing that declaring him a peer of guys like Matt Murray and Connor Hellebuyck, which ricardodw did, makes no sense as those guys have greater resumes as professionals.
|
This wasn't directed specifically at you, the stats argument can go either way. I agree with your last paragraph - until he puts up solid pro stats he shouldn't be measured against those who have.