Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix
What if the team wanted to expose him? Would they be allowed even if he was exempt? It would make more sense to do that than to sign Johnson to an extension just to expose him. If I'm Johnson, I would just say thanks but no thanks, unless he wants to risk going to Vegas.
|
Teams select who to protect , not expose (sounds like the same thing but its not ) . The eligible players are determined by the league.
While its true right now we have no eligible players in the system (due to pro length and 2 with UFA status) Im sure BT has thought this through. Unlike jay "loophole" Feaster.
What BT has is options. picking up a bargain on a team desperate to unload a minor leaguer at worst is a backup plan . he has a year to figure it out. I have confidence he will