Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois
Yeah maybe. Or maybe they should have just traded colborne. My gripe is more with losing him for nothing than losing him in general.
The flames cap crunch and colborne's arbitration rights aren't surprises. To have a 'woops, we have to let him walk' moment is a bit weak from flames management. they should never have been in this position.
And they're still in it. That might bug me more.
|
You're assuming someone would have given something up for him in a trade when that's by no means a given by the small salary he signed for. Odd thing to be upset about.