Quote:
Originally Posted by 1CupChuck
So Lucic's and Brouwer's contract expire when they are the same age? Personally, I would rather have Lucic for $1.5 mil more than Brouwer. If everyone expects Lucic's game to fall off a cliff after the age of 32 couldn't the same be said for Brouwer?
|
The added $1.5m AAV & the added term could be just enough to strangle us cap-wise.
Lucic is the better player, but is he $1.5m better? I'm not sure.
I would have been happy with either player, but Brouwer's contract fits the cap structure better as a support player.