Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan in Exile
Can't say I'm surprised and really doesn't reflect well on Treliving that he was signed for 2 years at 2.5. That's two guys we had control over - Colborne and Byron we let go for nothing. And that's from someone who likes the Brouwer signing.
Whether Treliving has worked the phones or not, he has missed some windows and shown some misjudgment on a number of things. In the end I think we have a strong squad and it's hard to know how important these things are. It's not like Benning letting Hamhuis go for nothing but still don't like it.
|
How does this reflect bad on Trelviing? He could have had Colborne if he wanted to and we don't know if there was any team offering anything at the deadline.
This is exactly what Treliving wanted.