Quote:
Originally Posted by White Doors
Wow, that comparison is weak. The Un mandates through the IAEA who has nukes and who doesn't. Almost all countries signed on the the non-ploliferation treaty.
Disregarding the illogical argument that it's the 'gun's fault' the anti-gun people are missing the fact that there is ZERO chance of getting rid of guns in any society.
|
That's not the argument I'm making.
The argument that Jolinar made was;
If people don't have guns they will use something else to kill, so don't regulate guns.
This argument could also be appllied to nukes in that case. e.g,
If people don't have nukes, they will use something else to kill, so don't regulate nukes.
What's the difference?