The concern is Kekalainen not interested in drafting Puljarjvi. Fellow countrymen and has seen a lot of him first hand. More than any of us. And he's not going to pick him?
As mentioned earlier, is it possible to consider that Nylander could turn out to be better or just as good as Puljarjvi?
Is it worth giving up so much?
6th and a 2nd and Colborne for Hartnell and 3rd isn't so bad.
Anything more is a bit reckless.
Last edited by IgiTang; 06-21-2016 at 09:54 PM.
|