View Single Post
Old 06-20-2016, 11:48 PM   #345
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post
If that's the case then the Flames should be trading Backlund as a rental and signing Bennett long term. I understand you have to give up quality to get quality, but Bennett is too much quality to give up in my opinion.
Which is why I am not sold on the trade and am just throwing it out there.

That said, Bennett got the bulk of his production on the wing. Much of it next to Backlund ironically (funny how many players produce next to him). If the Flames project him as a winger (and I am not saying they do) that might sway things.

Adding Puljujarvi and Hartnell to RW, losing Wideman, and still selecting at 6 would go a long way in moving the club forward. Even with the loss of Bennett.
kehatch is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post: