Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I get the comparison but different situations.
Feaster and co missed the small print in an existing document. Treliving has already said we will have to wait and see in a document as of yet not seen.
Now if the rules were released and he traded for a goaltender and then realised he had to expose Gillies it would be different.
Having said all that ... those that take the time to go through the capfriendly calculator ... will Gillies be at risk of being taken anyway?
|
Not to revisit this, but, since you started it... ; )
No. The initial memorandum of understanding was written in such a way that Feaster's interpretation was correct, and that was all that existed at the time. Due to Feaster's interpretation being valid, the final document was changed.