Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
No, just players with NMC's that extend to at least 2017/18.
|
Thanks that is at least something to work with for GM''s.
Otherwise a new team could have a roster superior to several existing squads.
I realize that the NHL wants a new team to not be cannon fodder to start off with but giving them a distinct advantage over other teams isn't really right.
Good to see the NHL addressed the NMC players properly.
Also just the pure essence of a player with a NMC being forced to move to club they didnt stipulate as ok would be just wrong contractual wise.
The players that Las Vegas will be able to choose from should result on paper as a competitive team but chemistry will be parimount.