View Single Post
Old 06-15-2016, 12:48 PM   #445
HockeyIlliterate
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamenspiel View Post
Seems to be a bi-partisan effort brewing to reject gun applications from people on the "no-fly" and/or "terrorism watch" lists. That would certainly be a step forward, apparently they are just haggling over which restricted watch lists to include.
I'd expect the Supreme Court to strike down any such effort, if and when it is enacted into law. The "no-fly" and "terrorism watch" lists do not provide for due process, and then there's that pesky 2nd Amendment issue.*

Of course, a Clinton-packed Supreme Court would likely rule differently than the Court's current make-up, which is an issue I fully expect the RNC et al. to highlight over the next few months.

* On this issue, look for strange bed-fellows, like the NRA joined with the ACLU. The ACLU's objections to the list (even in the context of gun rights) can be found here: https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-free...oples-freedoms

Last edited by HockeyIlliterate; 06-15-2016 at 12:51 PM.
HockeyIlliterate is offline