Quote:
Originally posted by EddyBeers+Oct 31 2004, 04:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (EddyBeers @ Oct 31 2004, 04:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-HOZ@Oct 30 2004, 03:57 PM
And our first apologist comes out of the wood work. 
I guess those 23 Canucks were in need of kill'n. 
|
They were in need of "kill'n" just as much as the 100,000 Iraqi's that have been slaughtered since the Yanks went over there. That is almost three times as many as Saddam got in his time there. I bet they get up around 200K before they leave. [/b][/quote]
if you are talking about the recent report of 100,000 killed, the report shows that the researchers were 95% certain that there were between 8,000 and 194,000 dead. thats quite a margin of error. not very convincing to me