Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude
I think you're just poking the bear, but just in case:
Note that this also applies to the city claiming that this is a $1.8B project. Sorry, City of Calgary, this might be a $1.8B project but you know damn well you'll eventually have to do a bunch of this stuff. You should have done yourselves a favor and come across as the intelligent one here by calculating and communicating the truth which so obviously lies in the middle here.
|
Wasn't poking the bear at all, just hadn't done my research and seen your earlier post. I always worry that when I ask questions I'll come off like I'm actually challenging, so I assure you I'm honestly trying to get your point on this.
Is your point that you feel like Flames aren't taking into account that they would be forcing the clean up earlier than the City would otherwise do it (which I agree and feel is a huge roadblock to the Flames proposal), and because the discount rate of money (whatever it might be, understood you are using 5%) that this represents an increase in cost for the city?