Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
Is the argument that Gillies is eligible based on his time shadowing the team at the end of 2014/15? Because he clearly didn't play and from my perspective should be exempt. Although I don't know if he was every placed on a roster AHL or NHL that year, which would be an amazing way to lose a player. That and the ramifications of Sam Bennett's extra 3 games... ouch.
Frolik should be exposed. The value with a UFA is in the early years, if the expansion team takes him you've basically got a good UFA on a reasonable 2 year deal and avoided the big salary as he ages. I guess that's provided they actually find anybody who can play RW this year which is a big if.
Stajan, Frolik or Bouma and Jokipakka.
Hate to lose Frolik or Jokipakka.
|
Frolik will NOT be exposed, he is one of our only positive possession players and is the direction the team wants to go.