Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
The team (besides the Flames) that really gets screwed by this is Tampa with Bishop.
They'll be forced to protect Bishop and expose Vasilevskiy right now regardless, but if they don't re-sign Bishop, he'll be exposed and become a UFA 10 days later. They'd have no goalies.
So when it comes to re-signing Bishop before the expansion draft, his camp will have all the leverage.
Literally the stupidest rule ever.
But, somehow, I imagine the only team that will end up getting screwed is the Flames.
|
Yikes, I missed that one.
I still want to know if MAF needs to be protected too. The guy has a Limited NTC and a NMC according to CapFriendly, and as ar as I know there is no such thing as a limited NMC. A No-Move clause is a No-Move clause and he should have to be protected, which means they have to either trade him within the limits of his NTC or leave Murray exposed.
Going to be interesting times.