Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
It would be upheld though. The player would never be forced to move, the contract would not be violated. The only difference would be the expansion team having exclusive negotiation rights for like 2 weeks?
If someone really wanted to get that pedantic, as long as the NHL and NHLPA agree the rules can be whatever they want. If they wanted to make it that NMC that expire after July 31, 2017 they could just do that...
|
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make other than you are arguing for the sake of arguing. I'm simply saying upholding a valid contract is not illogical, that's all.