View Single Post
Old 06-03-2016, 02:21 PM   #181
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
I disagree, the most logical (and legal) would be any player with a valid NMC on the date of the draft has to be protected. Ignoring a clause in a contract just because it is expiring is not really logical at all.
Might be legal, but it wouldn't be logical at all.

Being forced to protect a player who isn't under contract to play another game for your team would be completely stupid and totally illogical.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post: